| When
are polygraph examinations given?
Common Uses
of Polygraph Examinations
|
Law Enforcement and Other Government
Agencies
For nearly a century, law enforcement agencies have used the polygraph
instrument or a form thereof in the early days of polygraph, as
an investigative tool. Polygraph examinations can be used as a tool
to determine the accuracy of information from cooperating witnesses,
suspects and from victims when appropriate to allow the agency officials
to focus their resources on information believed to be reliable.
Polygraph examinations are also used as a tool during pre employment
screening of applicants desiring to work for a law enforcement or
government agency.
The polygraph instrument can also be used as a tool in conjunction
with an investigation to maintain the integrity of law enforcement
agencies and other governmental agencies. During internal investigations
within an agency, those in positions of public trust may themselves
request to submit to a polygraph examination to reveal their honesty
regarding an issue, or the agency officials who are the focus of
the investigation may be asked to take a polygraph examination.
These polygraph examinations can either indicate an officer or public
employee is being truthful in their statements about the issue under
investigation or can detect deception and indicate avenues for further
explanation.
How
Organizations Become Corrupt
Ethical Dilemma Test
Regulatory governmental agencies that issue licenses to regulated
industries may request applicants to submit to a polygraph examination
when the agency believes that fraudulent documents have been submitted
to the licensing authority. Polygraph examinations may be used in
cases where business arrangements of the applicant are suspect.
For example, if one is disqualified and is ineligible to receive
a license, the disqualified person may apply for the license with
another individual’s name and information, and attempt to
use this fraudulently obtained license in the operation of the business.
If the polygraph examiner determines that the examinee is truthful
in his or her answers to questioning related to the documents submitted
to the agency, then the agency can make a determination in issuing
a license. If applicants show deception then the licensing authority
can direct its investigative resources on these cases and investigate
further the business of these applicants in the areas of suspected
fraud.
Back to Top
Attorneys
Prosecutors may take into consideration the results of polygraph
examinations. A prosecutor has nothing to lose, and a great deal
to gain, by offering a criminal suspect a polygraph examination
with the understanding that the results will be "considered"
in making a charging decision. In the event the suspect is reported
as telling the truth, the prosecutor should seriously review the
evidence against the suspect and consider the possibility that the
police misinterpreted evidence or overlooked other possible suspects.
This is especially true when the evidence against a defendant is
circumstantial or based on an eyewitness or victim's account.
A prosecutor has a responsibility not only to the crime victim
but also to make every reasonable effort to not charge an innocent
person with a crime. A polygraph examination, when conducted by
a competent examiner, offers highly accurate results which, in most
cases, support the police investigation. In those instances when
a defendant does produce truthful polygraph results, the prosecutor
should reevaluate the evidence or strongly consider the probability
that the defendant is innocent. In cases where a victim's statements
are suspicious or as a result of a suspect being truthful in a polygraph
examination, and where not prohibited by law, a prosecutor should
consider asking the victim to take a polygraph examination. In addition
to pre-trial applications, polygraph results are used with increased
frequency in pre-sentence investigations and as a condition of probation.
Attorneys utilize the polygraph instrument and the results of polygraph
examinations. Once a defendant is represented by counsel, especially
in a serious offense, it is common for the attorney to ask his or
her client to take a private polygraph examination. If the results
of this examination indicate deception, the prosecution rarely learns
of this and, in fact, the entire examination results are protected
from pre-trial discovery through the work-product rule. However,
if the defendant produces truthful results, the prosecuting attorney
is among the first to be informed.
If an attorney’s client is determined to show signs of truthfulness
during the polygraph examination, the prosecuting attorney may request
a copy of the examiner's written report to determine exactly what
questions were asked of the defendant. The questions asked of the
defendant should directly address the issue under investigation
and not allow for rationalization or specific denials. The prosecutor
may also review the test structure, perhaps with another polygraphist,
to determine if the test was conducted properly based upon the standard
guidelines and procedures that must be followed for each type of
examination given. If there is a question with regards to the original
polygraph results, the defendant could be requested to submit to
a second examination under the scrutiny of the prosecution, or the
prosecutor could arrange for a second examiner to evaluate the subject's
polygraph charts to check the reliability of the first decision.
Back to Top
Domestic / Relationship and Fidelity
Testing
Relationship issues are commonly resolved with a polygraph examination.
A polygraph examination can be used to objectively make a determination
as to the truthfulness of one’s reported background, such
as sexual history, drug or gambling habits. Examinations are also
administered when it is suspected that one or both of the partners
have had sexual contact with anyone besides the other partner.
Back to Top
Employee Theft / Monetary Loss
to Employers
Private businesses may request that an employee submit to a polygraph
examination under the restrictions and limitations of the Employee
Polygraph Protection Act of 1988.
An employer is able to request that an employee take a polygraph
examination, but the employer is restricted as to when this request
can be made, and certain requirements must be met before such a
request is made. First, the only form of a lie detection instrument
that an employer may request be used is a polygraph instrument,
excluding anything such as voice stress analysis equipment. There
must be a specific economic loss or injury to the employer’s
business, such as theft. The employer must be able to document that
the employee had access to the object in question resulting in the
economic loss or injury, and the employer must have reasonable suspicion
that the employee was involved in or assisted with the incident
or activity under investigation which resulted in the economic loss.
The employer is required to notify the employee in writing at least
48 hours prior to the polygraph examination, informing the employee
of the specific incident that is being investigated that resulted
in a specific economic loss or injury to the business. This written
statement to the employee must also indicate that the employee had
access to the property that is the subject of the investigation,
and describe the basis of the employer’s reasonable suspicion
that the employee was involved in the incident or activity under
investigation that resulted in economic loss or injury to the employer.
This form must be signed by both the employer and the employee,
and retained by the employer for at least three years. Integrity
Resources LLC will require a copy of this form before administering
a polygraph exam.
It is recommended that you read the regulations pertaining to the
Employee Polygraph Protection Act, as well as consult with your
attorney, prior to asking an employee to take a polygraph examination.
There are additional exemptions in the Employee Polygraph Protection
Act that apply to employers whose business is to manufacture, distribute
or dispense controlled substances, in addition to those exemptions
allowing pre-employment polygraph testing for prospective employees
of such businesses. Current employees may be asked to take a polygraph
examination in connection with an ongoing investigation pertaining
to a theft of drugs or diversion of drugs. The requirements for
an employer to request an employee take a polygraph examination
are less stringent when the business is registered under the Controlled
Substance Act, and the loss or potential loss includes a controlled
substance.
If you are a business owner and would like to develop a better
understanding of what is required prior to requesting an employee
to submit to a polygraph examination, please call or visit the following
links:
Printable
Summary of Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) Requirements
Summary of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act by the American
Polygraph Association - http://www.polygraph.org/eppa.htm
Link to EPPA (Employee Polygraph Protection Act) - http://www.dol.gov/dol/compliance/comp-eppa.htm
Employers should develop their own forms, using their own company
name, and should also review their final forms with legal counsel.
Click
here to download a template of the necessary EPPA form.
Back to Top
Pre-Employment Examinations
Polygraph examinations are commonly used as a
pre-employment screening tool for applicants desiring to work for
law enforcement and government agencies, as well as those private
businesses that fall under the exemptions of the Employee Polygraph
Protection Act. It is the responsibility of those employing law
enforcement personnel to maintain the integrity of the agency and
its employees, and to maintain a professional image. With authority
comes responsibility and accountability.
Law enforcement agencies are entrusted by their citizenry to confirm
that police applicants are not criminals or illegal drug users,
or have a propensity for dishonesty. Society only wants those members
of the public who are honest and possess high standards and integrity
to serve in positions of public trust. The courts rely on police
officers’ testimony in taking property and freedom from citizens,
and truthfulness on the part of police officers is imperative. Dishonesty
and deviant acts cannot be tolerated within law enforcement and
other government agencies, or any business for that matter. In dealing
with lies or deceit, the public’s trust and confidence is
sorely undermined, which is essential to the agencies’ ability
to fight crime and serve the community effectively.
If an applicant’s propensity for dishonesty is found before
the applicant is hired, there is a good indication that problems
will arise should the person be hired. The best indicator of future
performance is past performance. The polygraph examination can uncover
these areas of dishonesty, and promote honesty among future applicants
who have knowledge that the information they provide on their application
paperwork is subject to verification through the polygraph technique.
The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) estimated that
6 percent of total revenues are lost annually as a result of occupational
fraud and abuse, costing the U.S. economy over $600 billion. This
includes asset misappropriations, corruption and fraudulent statements.
Twenty percent of all resumes contain fraudulent information such
as omitted employers or extended dates of employment, misleading
academic credentials or false certification information. Certified
Fraud Examiners were asked in a recent study to rank eight fraud
prevention methods according to their perceived effectiveness. Ranking
second on the list was background checks on new employees. Finally,
in a recent study of over 1,000 cases of identity theft, it was
determined that the victim’s identity was originally pilfered
by a company employee in 50 percent of the cases, and is suspected
in 20 percent more (as high as 7 out of 10 cases).
Most opponents to pre-employment polygraph examinations believe
that the person taking the polygraph examination is under duress,
and they claim the procedure is an invasion of privacy. Those under
any alleged duress during pre-employment polygraph screening are
those who falsified their employment application or who are hiding
one or more recent past wrongs and fear detection. Those who have
been untruthful at some point during their application process are
the ones who experience duress, and any alleged duress is of their
own making.
When a subject completes an employment application, and submits
it to a prospective employer, he or she automatically opens the
information he or she has freely given to inquiry and verification,
and it is reasonable to assume that all of the information provided
will be evaluated and verified by any legal available means. The
subject no longer has any claims to real or mythical privacy. Polygraph
examinations are based on well established principles to verify
the content of a person’s own employment application and previous
work history, and on areas related to that applicant’s criminal
history. Polygraph examinations help the background investigators
pinpoint problem areas.
There are specific exemptions in the Employee Polygraph Protection
Act that allow for businesses to request that prospective employees
take a polygraph examination. One exception applies to Federal,
State and local governments, because the government is exempt from
the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. This exemption allows government
agencies, including law enforcement agencies, to request prospective
law enforcement officers and other government employees to submit
to a polygraph exam. Another exemption allows for employers authorized
to manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substances to
request that prospective employees take a polygraph examination
when those prospective employees will have direct access to controlled
substances.
There are also specific exceptions allowing polygraph examinations
to be given to prospective employees of private businesses who provide
certain exempted security functions. Any private employer whose
primary business (50% or more of the business’s tasks) consists
of employing and providing armored car or security personnel, including
security alarm system personnel, and whose functions includes protecting
specified facilities or assets, can request prospective employees
to take a polygraph examination. The prospective employees must
be “employed to protect” such exempted facilities or
assets listed in the regulations pertaining to the Employee Polygraph
Protection Act.
Prior to asking any prospective or current employee to take a polygraph
examination, become familiar with the Employee Polygraph Protection
Act, and consult your attorney.
Back to Top
Sex Offender Testing
Polygraph examinations have been used for the treatment and monitoring
of post-convicted sex offenders during their parole and probation
periods. Treatment programs require the administration of initial
and periodic polygraph examinations for the purpose of verifying
treatment compliance, and identifying parole violations and recidivism.
Back to Top
Other Uses
Click here
to write a description of your situation, and we will work with
you to determine if our services may be beneficial to you. There
are a number of situations where a polygraph examination can prove
useful. Insurance companies may request a polygraph examination
to be administered to one suspected of insurance fraud. Do you have
a roommate that you suspect of theft? Are you a parent with concerns
about your son or daughter’s activities? Do you have a business
relationship concern or dispute? Do you want to reveal to someone
that you are being truthful about an issue of concern? Are you running
for office and attempting to resolve issues that have been brought
up during the election campaign?
Back to Top
<< Home
|